Thursday, October 6, 2011

Water Fight on the River - Round Sixteen

16. Question. How swift was the current in the River Sidon? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

16. Answer. The Book of Mormon describes a high flow, low current river which means gentle slope gradients.
--
16. Exhibit. We have previously established that the Mezcalapa-Grijalva has a relatively high slope gradient along its entire course, while the Usumacinta has a much smaller slope gradient. See the article "Dividing the Rivers" in this blog. We will let Excel show us graphically the relative difference between the two rivers.
Slope gradient of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva
compared with the Usumacinta.
A steeper slope causes faster current in a river. The current in the Mezcalapa-Grijalva in general flows much faster than the current in the Usumacinta. This is shown by the hydroelectric potential of the two rivers. The number of hydroelectric installations on the Usumactinta is 0, even though it carries a higher volume of water. The Mezcalapa-Grijalva has four hydro plants listed in upstream-downstream order:
  • La Angostura
  • Chicoasen
  • Malpaso
  • Penitas
These 4 dams on the Mezcalapa-Grijalva produce more hydroelectricity than all of the other dams in Mexico combined.
--
Early Spanish writers have left us many lively accounts of crossing the raging Mezcalapa-Grijalva River. They use terms such as "furioso" (furious) and "espantoso" (terrifying) to describe the experience. Friar Alonso Ponce wrote of an experience he had with native canoe men crossing the Mezcalapa-Grijalva in 1586 near the present day city of Tuxtla Gutierrez: "the river was in flood stage and was a large quarter of a league wide." (A Spanish league was the distance a man or horse could walk in one hour - about 4.2 kilometers or 2.6 miles. The river was about 1 kilometer or 2/3 of a mile wide at this point.) Father Ponce continued: "and in order to come out by canoe at the landing on the other side they took it a great stretch upriver and afterwards the furious current passed it across." Relacion breve y verdadera de algunas cosas de las muchas que sucedieron al Padre Fray Alonso Ponce en las provincias de la Nueva Espana, siendo Comisario General de aquellas partes, first published in Madrid in 1873. In other words, in order to cross the big, fast Mezcalapa-Grijalva River and end up at the desired point on the far bank, the native boatmen first had to portage or drag their craft a long distance upstream because the current would take them downstream much faster than they could pole or paddle laterally across it. Anyone who has spent time canoeing or kayaking on a swift river understands the challenge. In a fast current, it is easy to overshoot your destination.
--
Then there is the element of mortal danger. We established previously that the natives in Chiapas were afraid of and assiduously avoided a 75-kilometer stretch of the river and its environs from Cahuare to Quechula. See the article "Water Fight on the River - Round Fifteen" in this blog. Even downstream from Quechula, though, many people lost their lives in the rapids. At one point, the colonial government in Guatemala (Chiapas then belonged to Guatemala) closed the Mezcalapa-Grijalva downstream from Quechula (today the Malpaso Reservoir area) to all river traffic to avoid further loss of life. Fernando Castanon Gamboa, "Panorama historico de las comunicaciones en Chiapas," in Ateneo, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Ano 1, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1951.
--
16. Conclusion. The Book of Mormon describes people interacting with the River Sidon in predictable, non-threatening ways. They travel upstream and downstream. They cross in either direction without incident and sometimes on the spur of the moment without much preparation. The languid Usumacinta fits the text very well. The turbulent Mezcalapa-Grijalva, though, was a very different kind of river in Book of Mormon times (before modern dams tamed vast stretches of it). Travel upstream in large areas at certain times of the year was not feasible. Travel in certain areas was simply not done at any time. Travel under the best of circumstances was often frightening and could be deadly. The Mezcalapa-Grijalva does not fit The Book of Mormon text. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
16. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 16.
--
Editor's asynchronous note: See the article "Observations from a River Runner" in this blog for another confirmatory viewpoint. 

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Water Fight on the River - Round Fifteen

15. Question. Did the River Sidon have any major obstructions that inhibited movement up and down the river? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

15. Answer. No. The text describes difficult travel both up and down river, but nothing that required a major detour.
--
15. Exhibit. The Usumacinta is a relatively placid river along its entire course. Outfitters who take adventure travelers down the Usumacinta in motorized rafts do not emphasize whitewater - there isn't much. They advertise pristine jungle with awe-inspiring Mayan ruins set amid luxuriant flora and fauna. The Mezcalapa-Grijalva, on the other hand, has one 13-kilometer stretch that everyone talks about: the world-famous El Sumidero Canyon just downstream from Chiapa de Corzo and Tuxtla Gutierrez.
El Sumidero Canyon from an eye altitude of 380 kilometers. 
El Sumidero is a deep canyon with shear vertical walls rising as high as 800 meters (2,600 feet) above the river. The head of El Sumidero is the dividing point between the upper and lower Mezcalapa-Grijalva.
El Sumidero Canyon from an eye altitude of 14 kilometers.
The river makes sharp 90-degree bends and the water is very deep, giving the Sumidero a well-deserved reputation for danger. Many would-be river runners lost their lives in this canyon before an elite Mexican army team finally ran it in the 1960's. It is also a popular but deadly BASE jumping destination.
El Sumidero Canyon from one of the
lookout points along the canyon rim.
The slope gradients along this part of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River are very steep. As a result, the 261- meter high Chicoasen dam just downstream from El Sumidero Canyon produces more electricity than any other hydroelectric installation in Mexico.
El Sumidero Canyon from the Mezcalapa-Grijalva River.
Some notable facts about El Sumidero Canyon:
  • This 13-kilometer section of river has 35 rapids that become more violent in the dry season
  • During the rainy season, many waterfalls cascade down the steep canyon walls
  • It was Mexico's entry in the New Seven Wonders of the Natural World Competition
  • It is the second most popular tourist attraction in Chiapas (after Palenque)
  • The Chiapa commited mass suicide jumping off the cliffs rather than submit to the Spaniards
  • In the 2009-2010 season, six tourists drowned along this treacherous section of river.
El Sumidero Canyon looms so large in the history and popular culture of Chiapas that it is the most prominent feature on the state seal.
El Sumidero Canyon on the Chiapas State Seal.
Thomas A. Lee, Jr., in his excellent article, "The Historical Routes of Tabasco and Northern Chiapas and their Relationship to Early Cultural Development in Central Chiapas," in Mesoamerican Communication Routes and Cultural Contacts, Provo: BYU-NWAF Paper Number 40, 1978, observed that the  natives gave wide berth to both the Mezcalapa-Grijalva river and the rugged terrain around the river for a full 75-kilometer stretch from Cahuare upstream from El Sumidero Canyon to Quechula near the eastern edge of the modern Malpaso reservoir.
75-kilometer section of the Mezcalapa-Grijalva in red that 
the Chiapas natives detoured widely around because  
travel in the area was so difficult and dangerous. 
--
15. Conclusion. You can travel up and down the Usumacinta without major barriers. People anciently did not travel up and down the Mezcalapa-Grijalva through the El Sumidero Canyon area. They went around it - way around it. The Usumacinta better fits the text of the Book of Mormon. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
15. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 15.

Water Fight on the River - Round Fourteen

14. Question. Did the River Sidon ever change course? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

14. Answer. Not during Book of Mormon times.
--
14. Exhibit. We have previously established that geologists and hydrologists in Tabasco have documented large course changes in the lower Mezcalapa-Grijalva since the Jaredite - Mulekite era. See the article "Wandering River" in this blog. The graphic highlights some of the many channels the lower Mezcalapa-Grijalva has flowed through in recent millenia. Some of the course changes occurred naturally. Others in historic times were man-made.
Course changes in the lower Mezcalapa-Grijalva.
The Usumacinta, on the other hand, is a mature river that has run in more or less its current course since Book of Mormon times.
--
14. Conclusion. The Book of Mormon text describes a geographically stable river Sidon. The Usumacinta best fits this criterion. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
14. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalvaa 0. Usumacinta 14.

Water Fight on the River - Round Thirteen

13. Question. Did the Lands of Nephi and Zarahemla share similar topography? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

13. Answer. No.
--
13. Exhibit A. Mining is important to the economies of both Mexico and Guatemala, so many geological studies have been done to identify and prove out ore deposits. Many mines are currently producing. Others are in various stages of planning and development. Large scale mining operations have been going on for centuries in the mountainous highlands of both countries. This image depicts mining activity in Guatemala according to the US Geological Survey World Mineral Resources data base. Click to enlarge the image to full-size (this is true for all images on this blog).
Mining activity in Guatemala.
Similarly, the Chiapas highlands have many current and potential mining operations. This map is from the Servicio Geologico Mexicano SGM.
Mining activity in Chiapas.
When we get into the state of Tabasco, though, it is a different story. There is very little mining activity, particularly for metallic minerals, in the state of Tabasco, as one would expect of coastal plains in general. This map of Mexican metallic mining potential is published by SGM. It shows areas with deposits of gold, copper, silver, lead/zinc, manganese, and molybdenum.
Metallic mineral potential in Mexico.
Zooming in on our area of interest, it is apparent that Tabasco is one of the few areas in Mexico with very little potential for metallic mineral exploitation. The number 14 on this map (slightly misplaced) represents the big Ixhuatan gold mine in the Chiapas highlands about midway between Tuxtla Gutierrez and Villahermosa.
Close up of metallic mineral potential in Mexico.
13. Conclusion A. In the Book of Mormon, metallic minerals are mentioned frequently as stores of wealth and materials of commerce, tax or tribute. Specialized language, though, describes mineral exploration, extraction and refining processes, and these mining activities are limited in the text to:
This mining activity vocabulary is conspicuously absent in the text in the Land of Zarahemla. The people living in Zarahemla were as wealthy as their brethren in the highlands Alma 1:29, but their gold and silver came through trade and other economic activities besides mining Alma 4:6. The Land of Zarahemla, beside the river Sidon, is likely to be in a lowland area without significant metallic mineral mining activity. The upper and middle Mezcalapa-Grijalva, flowing through mountainous uplands, does not fit this criterion. The middle Usumacinta fits well. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
13. Exhibit B. We will anchor a plane above the ground at an absolute altitude of 500 meters (1,640 feet). Any surface of the earth projecting through this plane we will consider highlands, and any surface below it we will call lowlands. The Mezcalapa-Grijalva River system is in blue, the Usumacinta in red. River drainage basins are outlined in yellow. Two suggested candidates for Zarahemla, Santa Rosa on the Mezcalapa-Grijalva and Nueva Esperanza II on the Usumacinta are also shown.
The Mezcalapa-Grijalva and Usumacinta River systems with highlands
above 500 meters elevation indicated.
 13. Conclusion B. Most of the upper and middle Mezcalapa-Grijalva flows through intermontane highlands, terrain similar to the area around Guatemala City. The entire Usumacinta and many of its major tributaries flow through lowlands. Based on atmospheric visibility, climatic, and topographic factors, the text of The Book of Mormon implies that the Land of Zarahemla was a lowland region, quite different from Nephi in the highlands. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
13. Conclusion. The Usumacinta River basin is distinctly different from highland Guatemala in a variety of topographic ways. The Usumacinta best fits The Book of Mormon text.
--
13. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 13.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Water Fight on the River - Round Twelve

12. Question. Did the Lands of Nephi and Zarahemla share a similar climate? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

12. Answer. No.
--
12. Exhibit. To test the two rivers, we will compare meteorological data from Guatemala City (Nephi) with data from Tuxtla Gutierrez in the Mezcalapa-Grijalva basin, and from the city of Balancan in the Usumacinta basin. Our sources are Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI) and Servicio Meteorologico Nacional (SMN) (a division of CONAGUA) in Mexico, and Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganaderia y Alimentacion (MAGA) in Guatemala. The chart shows four key climate measurements for the three locations: mean annual temperature in degrees Celsius, mean annual relative humidity expressed as a percent, mean annual precipitation in millimeters, and mean annual days with measurable precipitation, aka rainy days. In other words, we are measuring how hot, humid, and wet the climates are in these three places. Click on the chart to expand it to full-size (the same holds true for all images on this blog).
Key Climate Variables for Guatemala City, Guatemala;
Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas on the Mezcalapa-Grijalva;
and Balancan, Tabasco on the Usumacinta.
The Koppen climate classification system has been the de facto world standard for well over a century. We compare our areas of interest on Koppen climate maps of Mexico and Guatemala. The Mexican map is from the University of Texas which maintains one of the largest collections of Mesoamerican maps (Perry-Castaneda Collection) in the world. The Guatemalan map is from MAGA.
Koppen Climate Map of Mexico.
--
Koppen Climate Map of Guatemala.
The maps show that Guatemala City and Tuxtla Gutierrez both have an Aw climate classification. This is a sub-tropical savanna climate with distinct wet and dry seasons, often found on the margins of tropical areas. Balancan, on the other hand, has an Af tropical rain forest climate classification with precipitation more or less year-round.
--
12. Conclusion. Even though Tuxtla Gutierrez is considerably lower in elevation (540 meters) than Guatemala City (1,560 meters), and therefore hotter, the two places have the same sub-tropical climate (Koppen Aw) with very similar amounts of annual precipitation and average relative humidity. Balancan, Tabasco, on the middle Usumacinta, though, is a completely different story. Balancan is tropical - hotter, more humid, with more than twice as much rainfall and many more rainy days. It is understandable why Zeniff was "over-zealous" Mosiah 7:21 to escape the stifling mugginess of the middle Usumacinta and return (at great risk to himself and his followers) to the balmy highlands of Guatemala. (Guatemala City is justifiably famous for its invigorating climate that the locals call "eternal spring.") The Mezcalapa-Grijalva does not fit this criterion. The Usumacinta fits it very well. Advantage Usumacinta. 
--
12. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 12.

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Water Fight on the River - Round Eleven

11. Question. Was the Land of Zarahemla centrally located within the Land Southward? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog.

11. Answer. Yes, the Nephite worldview positioned the Land of Zarahemla more or less in the center of the Land Southward north of the Narrow Strip of Wilderness.
--
11. Exhibit. We place a possible narrow strip of wilderness line (see the article "Water Fight on the River - Round Nine" in this blog) on top of our map of the rivers, then draw a crude rectangular box to represent the limits of what the Nephites may have considered their sovereign lands in the time of Parhoran (critical text orthography), Helaman I and Captain Moroni. Running two more lines between the four corners of the box gives us its center.
An attempt to locate the center of Nephite lands
as they were circa 65 BC.
--
11. Conclusion. You may play around with the dimensions and locations of the sides of this box, but most plausible scenarios of the extent of Nephite-held territory in the Land Southward at their apogee will place the Usumacinta much closer to the center of their lands than the Mezcalapa-Grijalva. Advantage Usumacinta.
--
11. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 11.

  

Water Fight on the River - Round Ten

10. Question. What was the general direction from Nephi to Zarahemla? See the article "Asking the Right Questions" in this blog. Article last updated June 14, 2014.

10. Answer. Zarahemla was north of Nephi.
--
10. Exhibit. We place a ruler on our map of the rivers and have Google Earth calculate the heading of the line between Kaminaljuyu (Nephi) and Santa Rosa (proposed Zarahemla on the Mezcalapa-Grijalva). The heading is 127.56 degrees. 90 degrees would be due west. 135 degrees would be north- west. This line runs west-northwest. As with all images on this blog, click to enlarge.

Heading of the line between the Guatemala City area
and the Mezcalapa-Grijalva.
We do the same thing with Kaminaljuyu (Nephi) and Nueva Esperanza II (proposed Zarahemla on the Usumacinta). The heading is 158.54 degrees. 180 degrees would be due north. 135 degrees would be northwest. This line runs north-northwest.
Heading of the line between the Guatemala City area
and the Usumacinta.
--
10. Conclusion. The Usumacinta conforms much better with The Book of Mormon text. You have to go through all kinds of lexical gyrations to get the Mezcalapa-Grijalva's west-northwest heading even in The Book of Mormon ballpark. Advantage Usumacinta. 
--
10. Running Score. Mezcalapa-Grijalva 0. Usumacinta 10.
--
10. Note. Some Book of Mormon students, in an attempt to justify particular geographic correlations, try to argue that the Nephites used different cardinal and ordinal directions than we do today, or that the north, south, east, and west quadrants on Mormon's mental map were not equi-distant 90 degree quarters as The Book of Mormon text implies 1 Nephi 19:16, Mosiah 27:6. Most Mesoamericanists would dispute these ideas. The Maya had 4 directional glyphs that correspond with the 4 cardinal directions. Instances are found on the Dresden Codex, Rio Azul Structure A-3 Tomb 12, Copan Stela A, and the Yotz Kanpet ceramic bowl rim text, among many others. See for example Erik Boot's 2003 article "Colors and Associated Cardinal Directions on an Unprovenanced Late Classic Maya Ceramic Bowl" published on mayavase.com. Each of the 4 cardinal directions had a color. North was white, east red, south yellow, and west black. Blue/green represented the center of the quadrants. Each of the 4 cardinal directions was associated with 13 years in the 52 year calendar round. North were muluc years, east kan years, south cauac years, and west ix (hiix) years. Each cardinal direction also had a deity associated with it. The 4 bacabs and the 4 chaacs or atlantean sky-bearers are examples. Each cardinal direction had its own wind, and the Maya conceived of 4 sacred trees of life, one in each of the 4 directions. These multiple trees of life are the origin of the noted Maya "crosses" with perpendicular arms which are well known from Palenque and other sites. Diego de Landa in his 1566 Relacion de las Cosas de Yucatan, describes a Maya worldview with the same 4 cardinal directions the Spanish were familiar with. Contemporary Maya religious ritual, such as that practiced today in Momostenango, continues to honor the sacred nature of the 4 cardinal directions/deities with offerings around a circle as the priest faces east, then west, then north, and finally south. Symmetry in Mexican and Mayan art show that the ancient Mesoamericans used the same golden mean or golden section proportions that many Old World cultures such as the Egyptians scrupulously followed. The celebrated Aztec calendar stone on display in the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City is one example in bas relief sculpture.
Aztec Calendar Stone, a study in symmetrical proportions.
Among the many cosmological ideas represented on this sophisticated carving are the 4 cardinal directions and the 4 deities associated with them: Ehecatl (Quetzalcoatl) as god of the west, Huehueteotl as god of the north, Mictlantecuhtli as god of the south, and Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli as god of the east. Each of these gods is also an atlantean skybearer, jointly holding up the vault of heaven. This is the post-classic Nahua (Aztec) adaptation of a very old Mesoamerican and certainly Mayan concept. An interesting Morelian variant of this artifact is in the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. 
--
A Cotzumalhuapan-style ball court marker from the site of La Nueva, Guatemala shows four stylized trees of life in each of the four cardinal directions.
Stone sculpture from the Guatemalan piedmont area
showing north, south, east, and west life trees.
--
This serrated disk from Mexico shows the 4 cardinal directions and the intermediate points in typical equi-distant 90 degree quadrants. The serrations represent calendrical units. Time and space were often represented together symbolically in Mesoamerican art. Artifacts similar to this one are known from many sites throughout Mesoamerica.
Inlaid jade disk in The National Museum of Anthropology, Mexico City
The 8 rays show the 4 cardinal directions and the 4 intermediate points.
Photograph by Kirk Magleby, September, 2006.
--
In January of 378 AD, just as the Nephite nation was collapsing at Cumorah, a powerful military emissary from Teotihuacan named "Fire is Born" conquered the Maya city states of El Peru (Waka) and Tikal in present-day Guatemala. Teotihuacan-affiliated Tikal then went on to conquer Uaxactun, Copan, and other important Maya sites in a cross-cultural florescence that ushered in the Maya classic period. An inscription carved on the famous Tikal Stela 31 (the August, 2007 issue of National Geographic features a striking full-page image) describes this foreign invader as "Warlord of the West." Google Earth makes it easy to check the orientation of Teotihuacan relative to Tikal to see what the early classic Maya considered "west." Note that Teotihuacan in this era was the strongest empire in Mesoamerica with sites like Cholula, Xochicalco, and Matacapan (near The Book of Mormon Ramah/Cumorah) in its orbit. 
Teotihuacan west of Tikal.
Teotihuacan is on a heading 104.12 degrees from Tikal. 90 degrees is due west. 135 degrees is north- west. So, what the Maya in Book of Mormon times called "west" is analogous to our use of that term today.

A similar relationship is attested in post classic times. Toltec emissaries and culture from Tula Hidalgo greatly influenced the site of Chichen Itza in Yucatan. Many Maya sources describe Tula in the west and Chichen Itza in the east. See George Kubler, "Serpent and Atlantean Columns: Symbols of Maya-Toltec Polity" in The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 41 No. 2, May 1982, pp. 93-115. See also Douglas T. Peck, "The Geographical Origin and Acculturation of Maya Advanced Civilization in Mesoamerica" in Revista de Historia de America, No. 130, January - June 2002, pp. 7 - 28. Google Earth shows the heading between Tula Hidaldo and Chichen Itza is 84.61 degrees where 90 degrees is due east. Clearly, this ancient Maya usage of the terms "east" and "west" is analogous to our modern notion of those cardinal directions today.
Tula Hidalgo in the West, Chichen Itza in the East
 Structure A-4 Tomb 12 could hardly be more explicit. It shows the 4 Mayan glyphs for the 4 cardinal directions, and each glyph is oriented to the same north/south/east/west compass direction we use today.
The 4 Mayan glyphs for the 4 cardinal directions from Rio Azul
following David Stuart.
Chiapa de Corzo Mound 11, Tomb 1 has a similar arrangement of greenstone ax heads and celts dating from ca. 800 B.C. These objects were found on the center-line of the pyramid, oriented to the four cardinal directions. See Bruce  R. Bachand "Chiapa de Corzo: Rise of a Zoque Capital in the Heart of Mesoamerica" in Popular Archaeology, Volume 3, June 2011. Mound 11 was part of the earliest "E Group" yet discovered. An E Group is an astronomically-aligned collection of structures known from Zoque and Maya sites all over Mesoamerica. E Groups, first identified at Uaxactun, are typically oriented to the four cardinal directions.

Ritual offering from Chiapa de Corzo, Photograph by Bruce R. Bachand.
Literally hundreds of ancient sites and structures throughout Mesoamerica are oriented to the four cardinal directions we use today. For example, the site of Los Horcones in the Municipio of Tonalpa, Chiapas, Mexico is laid out on a north - south axis. See Pierre Agrinier, "The Ballcourts of Southern Chiapas, Mexico" in V. Scarborough and D. Wilcox, The Mesoamerican Ballgame, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991. The 95 meter long principal structure (archaeologists call it B-1) at the large nearby site of Iglesia Vieja faces due east. Akira Kaneko, "Investigacion Arqueologica en la Region Tonala de la Costa del Pacifico de Chiapas" in J.P. Laporte, B. Arroyo and H. Mejia, XXII Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueologicas en Guatemala, 2008, Guatemala City: Museo Nacional de Arqueologia y Etnologia, 2009.

At the site of Takalik Abaj, Christa Schieber de Lavarreda and Miguel Orrego in 2012 excavated six ceramic female figurines associated with a royal tomb. Four of the figurines, which date to ca. 500 B.C., were oriented to the four cardinal points, the corners of the Maya universe. The other two were oriented east - west. See "The King's Maidens" in National Geographic July 2014, p. 25.
Female effigies from Takalik Abaj, Photograph by Kenneth Garrett
Structure 7 at Takalik Abaj is thought to be an astronomical observatory. It has 3 rows of monuments aligned north - south. One of the rows pointed to the constellation Ursa Major (aka the big dipper) as it was in the middle pre-classic. Ursa Major points to Polaris, the current north polar star. See the article "Test #5 North South East and West" for context. One of the rows pointed to the constellation Draco as it was in the late pre-classic. Draco's bright star Thuban was the north polar star ca. 2,000 B.C.  

The Maya built sophisticated roads called sacbes. Many of them were oriented to the cardinal directions. Here is a map showing two of the best known sacbes in northern Yucatan oriented east/west. Modern cartographers often do the same thing when drawing political boundaries.
Ake to Izamal & Yaxuna to Coba Sacbes oriented E to W
just like portions of the Mexico/Guatemala border.
In April 2015 Timothy Pugh of Queens College, City University of New York gave a presentation at the 80th Annual Meeting of Society for American Archaeology SAA in San Francisco. He showed this LIDAR image of the oldest part of the site of Nixtun Ch'ich' just across Lake Peten Itza from Flores, Peten, Guatemala.
Preclassic Nixtun Ch'ich' Built on a Grid 
Occupied between 600 B.C. and 300 B.C. this early Maya site on the shores of Lake Peten Itza was laid out in a grid pattern. The main East West axis is only 3 degrees off true East. The ceremonial district runs along this EW axis, while residential areas are north and south of it. Prior to this discovery, the earliest Mesoamerican site known to have been built on a grid was Teotihuacan in Central Mexico.

The important preclassic Maya site Cerros was laid out on a north - south axis.

In Allen J. Christenson's translation of the Popol Vuh we read that both the earth and sky have four corners and four sides, measured with a cord strung between stakes that is then doubled over (Dennis Tedlock in his translation calls it "halving the cord" to find the midpoint). This resulted in a squared territory like a maize field, a house or a table. One of Christenson's informants, a traditional Maya priest, explained that when he is seated at his ritual table, "My body is in the form of a cross, just like the four sides of the world. This is why I face to the east and behind me is the west. My left arm extends out toward the north, any my right arm points to the south." Allen J. Christenson, Popol Vuh Electronic Library, English Translation, (Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 2007), note 39.

Christenson's remarkable interpretation of the Popol Vuh also includes two instances of the phrase "the East, where the sun rises." "The Defeat of Cabracan" paragraphs 4 & 14. On the equator, the sun viewed on a flat horizon rises due east on the vernal and autumnal equinoxes and ranges from 23.5 degrees north on the summer solstice to 23.5 degrees south on the winter solstice. As one moves northward, the range of variability from solstice to solstice increases slightly. So, at 15.5 degrees north latitude (Guatemala City) the sun viewed on a flat horizon rises due east on the vernal and autumnal equinoxes and ranges from 24.38 degrees north on the summer solstice to 24.38 degrees south on the winter solstice. The formula for calculating solstitial variation of sunrise points on a flat horizon is 23.5/cosign(latitude). So, during the course of one solar year in highland Guatemala the sun will rise at a variety of points in an arc slightly less than 50 degrees wide centered on due east. On a compass star, the east direction is 90 degrees wide from northeast to southeast, so a 50 degree arc fits comfortably within those bounds and almost fits within the 45 degree bounds of east northeast to east southeast. The direction the Quiche Maya authors of the Popol Vuh called "east" is the same direction we call "east" today because like them, our modern system is also based on the sunrise. See the blog article "Test #5 North South East and West."

Here is the idea of the four quarters of the earth, each with a cruciform tree of life and a sacred wind, as expressed on the first page of the Codex Fejervary-Mayer.
First page, Codex Fejervary-Mayer
And, here is the same idea represented in a Maya floral altar set up on the floor of a building in San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas in 2009. Note that this altar uses the traditional Maya color scheme: north - white, east - red, south - yellow and west - black. Since black blossoms are rare in this part of the world, the Maya priests who erect these altars often substitute purple for black and then paint a black stripe over the purple flowers.
Traditional Maya floral altar oriented to the four cardinal directions
Ancient Mesoamericans were such sophisticated observers of nature they calculated the 25,770 year precession of Venus. An entire sub discipline within Mesoamerican archaeology (archaeoastronomy) is dedicated to the study of site alignments with celestial phenomena. They knew how to plot true north even in the millenia before Polaris became the northern pole star. We have no reason to contort The Book of Mormon text into some arcane notion of skewed cardinal directions.

For a description of the four cardinal directions as understood by the precontact Quiche of highland Guatemala, see the blog article "Quichean Directionality." For the astronomical phenomena behind cardinal and ordinal directional systems worldwide see the blog article "Test #5 North South East West." For additional corroboration that Mesoamerican cultures used four solar-based cardinal directions see the blog article "Light from L.A."

On October 16, 2015 Richard Hansen, director of the Mirador Basin Project in northern Peten, gave a lecture at the Utah Museum of Natural History affiliated with the University of Utah. He said most Olmec sites are oriented N/S while most early Maya sites are oriented E/W and aligned to important solstitial and equinoctial points on the horizon. See the article "Hansen and Coe."

On March 8, 2016, Takeshi Inomata of the University of Arizona gave a lecture at the Harold B. Lee Library on BYU campus. He showed many examples of middle preclassic greenstone ax foundation deposits laid out in cruciform shape oriented to the four cardinal directions. See the article "Takeshi Inomata."
--
The article "Smoking Gun" has additional evidence that Mesoamerican directions followed traditional cardinal and intercardinal points, as does the article "Komkom Vase."
--
In addition, textual directions with credible correlations from the Middle East are testable. 1 Nephi 16:13 says the Lehites traveled in nearly a south-southeast direction. 1 Nephi 16:14 says they continued along that same heading for some time, generally following the shoreline of the Red Sea. 1 Nephi 16:33 describes the group continuing along basically the same course until they reached Nahom which correlates with modern Naham about 35 kilometers north east of Sana'a, the present-day capital of Yemen. See Noel B. Reynolds, "Lehi's Arabian Journey Updated" in Book of Mormon Authorship Revisited, Noel B. Reynolds, editor, (Provo, Utah: FARMS, 1997). This map shows a transect from Jerusalem on the north to the probable Nahom on the south.
General route from Jerusalem to likely Nahom
The route shown runs for 2,027 kilometers at a heading of 150.11 degrees where 90 is due east, 135 is southeast, 157.5 is south-southeast, and 180 is due south. The Book of Mormon description of "nearly south-southeast" precisely matches modern directional terminology.

From Nahom, the Lehites traveled nearly eastward 1 Nephi 17:1 until they reached the oasis Bountiful on the Omani coast. Bountiful was probably the area today known as Wadi Sayq (see the Reynolds article cited above).
Likely route nearly eastward from Nahom to Bountiful
This route runs for 944 kilometers on a heading of 81.21 degrees where 90 degrees is due east and 67.5 is east-northeast. Again, The Book of Mormon description "nearly eastward" is precisely the language we would use today to describe this direction of travel. The Book of Mormon concept of directional cardinality was very similar to our current notion.

This is not surprising since the Nephites and Lamanites came from Jerusalem where a directional system much like our own was embedded in the Hebrew language. "Saphon" (variant tzaphon) was the word for north, "negev" for south. "Kedem" (variants edom, adom) meaning "red" was the word for east, "yam" meaning "sea" for west. This map shows the geographic origins of 3 of these 4 Hebrew terms. The 4th probably had its origin in solar phenomena.
Cardinal directions used in ancient Jerusalem
"Saphon" came from Mount Zaphon in modern Turkey, almost due north of Jerusalem. "Negev" is the desert south of Jerusalem. "Yam" was the Mediterranean Sea west of the city. "Kedem" or "red" probably referred to the color of sunrise on the eastern horizon. Another possible derivation was geological. Edom, marked by the famous site Petra east of the Great Rift Valley, was and is well-known for the brilliant red color of its sandstone. The association of east (sunrise) with the color red is known from many ancient cultures, including the Maya.
--
Here is a little gem from Warren Aston via John W. Welch, a photo of one of three known inscribed altars from Nahom with the Semitic word "NHM" clearly visible. Since Semitic languages use only consonants, the name has been rendered variously as Nehem (original Ross T. Christensen suggestion), Naham (contemporary Yemeni map) and Nahom (1 Nephi 16:34).
NHM incised altar photo courtesy John W. Welch
With a meaning of suffering or mourning, NHM fits the text of 1 Nephi 16:35 precisely. Furthermore, this altar and the two known variants date from approximately Lehi's time period, ca. 600 B.C. Do we know where The Book of Mormon took place? In the case of Nahom in Yemen, the evidence seems clear and convincing.
--
Article last updated April 29, 2019.